Activision Blizzard has filed a robust defense against lawsuits filed by Uvalde school shooting victims' families, vehemently denying any causal link between its Call of Duty franchise and the tragedy. The May 2024 lawsuits allege the shooter's exposure to Call of Duty's violent content contributed to the horrific events of May 24, 2022, which claimed the lives of 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School.
The plaintiffs contend that Activision, alongside Meta (via Instagram), fostered an environment conducive to violence, exposing vulnerable adolescents to weaponry advertisements and violent content. The shooter, an 18-year-old former Robb Elementary student, was a Call of Duty player and used an AR-15 rifle, similar to those depicted in the game.
Activision's December filing, a comprehensive 150-page document, refutes these claims. The company asserts the absence of a direct causal relationship between Call of Duty and the shooting, invoking California's anti-SLAPP laws to protect its First Amendment rights. The defense highlights Call of Duty as a form of protected expression, arguing that allegations based on its "hyper-realistic content" infringe upon these fundamental rights.
Expert Testimony and Game Development Details
Strengthening its defense, Activision submitted declarations from key figures. Professor Matthew Thomas Payne of Notre Dame University provided a 35-page statement contextualizing Call of Duty within the broader tradition of military-themed entertainment, refuting the plaintiffs' "training camp" assertion. Patrick Kelly, Call of Duty's creative head, contributed a 38-page document detailing the game's development, including the substantial $700 million budget allocated to Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War.
The Uvalde families have until late February to respond to Activision's extensive documentation. The case underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the correlation between violent video games and real-world violence, with the ultimate outcome remaining uncertain.